Tuesday, August 30, 2005

Inching Closer to a Million

810,356 meters.

Considering I won't be back on the rower until at least Thursday morning (I'm in Canada this first part of the week), I'm very pleased to only be 189,644 meters from the goal. And, since I did five consecutive days of 10,000 meters last week, I feel confident that I'll put down the remaining meters quickly in September.

In case you're wondering, when you work out (no matter what you do) 13 of 14 days, you're tired at the end of 13 days. I must say that this three day respite is quite welcome. I will, though, not let the three days keep me from the goal. And, I'm sort of jonesing to get back on the rower already. Weird feeling.

That's the update. Keep those cards and letters coming!

Wednesday, August 24, 2005

Iraq'd You, Too

Our troops in Iraq are some of the bravest and probably underappreciated servicemen and women in this country. I salute each and every one of them who've either been there, are about to go, or are there today.

But I don't agree with our President on how long they'll remain there or that by pulling them out today, tomorrow or "soon", as he likes to mention, our country will be "weakened".

In removing Saddam Hussein, we did the world a favor. He's no longer killing his own people and collecting billions in foreign aid and other dollars to line his and his family's coffers. Bravo. Let's not get into the WMD discussion. Much as the evidence presented, the WMD argument seems to be one of hearsay on both sides.

I do think, though, that we're glossing over other issues, possibly bigger ones. Have we heard an update on our attempt to capture Osama Bin Laden? Or clean up the remains of what seems to be a re-growing Taliban in Afghanistan? If you've tried to keep educated on any of what happened leading up to 9/11 and its aftermath, you may have read Steve Coll's "Ghost Wars" and found that the US seems to be one reason the Taliban and Osama came to be such powerbrokers in terrorism. Our efforts to help the Mujahadeen drive the Soviets out of Afghanistan and curb the growth of Communism were a noble goal. Alas, they were also the beginning of what we now know as Al Qaeda.

Needless to say, we are where we are. What I want to present are a set of scenarios as to what we could be doing with our military and all other resources we currently expend in Iraq, along with the billions each and every day that are spent.

Pull out now: If we did this, President Bush says the US would be weakened. That's a challenging statement. Why? I think his comment seems to point out that a void would be created whereby the military would vanish, go poof, if they weren't in Iraq. They could not be redistributed to other areas, could not be reassigned to, oh, I don't know, find and capture Osama. Really? Are we really supposed to believe this? And, if the military stays through 2007, let's say, is President Bush saying we're safer in this country until the day they pull out? If so, won't we be weakened no matter when our military pulls out of Iraq? Are we to believe that just because a Democratic government with an approved constitution is put in place that the rebels will throw up their hands and say, "Geez, they got the constitution in place. Let's go home, give up our weapons, and vote fair and square in these cool democratic elections." I'm struggling with that one.

Pull out never: We could leave a contingent of our military in Iraq forever. This would entail setting up bases of operations for Middle Eastern operations, much like we have agreements with countries like Germany and Turkey to do the same thing. Would these remaining soldiers be in as much danger pre- or post-constitution and democratic government in Iraq? Or would they become sitting ducks for concentrated suicide bombing attempts, like early terrorism involving the USS Cole? How long would it be before Iraqis demand we get out? When enough of their civilians are killed as collateral during the attacks on US military personnel and infrastructure? Could we not alienate one of our few allies with this arrangement?

These answers may seem very black and white. And this is why I simply cannot agree much with our current administration. I know that our country's citizens seem to like everything boiled down to sound bites, which is why the Republicans get elected. But the answers are not always as black and white as we'd like. Why aren't more people outraged by our lack of Osama's capture? Doesn't it seem odd that the Brits caught a number of the London bombers within a week or so? And were able to hunt down a lot of the developments leading up to the bombing? Are our intelligence agencies still so far apart as they were purported to be before 9/11?

Are we not weakened more by our government's inability to stay focused, like someone with ADD, on finishing something before moving on to the next thing? All the while skimming over the issues that seem to be front and center for the grieving mothers, fathers, and families of those we lose overseas? Where's the accountability? Our country is rife with blame game hyperbole. Athletes do it. Politicians do it. We're all doing it. Nothing's our fault anymore. President Bush says Cindy Sheehan "does not speak for the majority of families who have lost relatives in combat", and will not speak with her during her and her entourage's protests while he's romping around during his 5-week vacation in Crawford. I ask you: Are we safer with our President on a 5-week vacation in Crawford than running the country in Washington? Why or why not?

Since when did the President only speak with Americans who represent the majority? I'd bet that there are plenty in the Moral Minority who've sat with the President to lobby him on things like abortion. Does this mean he can only meet with leaders of majorities? Would Martin Luther King, Jr. have qualified or would he have been classified as someone who does not speak for the majority of Americans who believe in segregation? Who in their right mind would give this to this to the President as his excuse for not meeting with Cindy Sheehan? One more for you: our President has plenty of time to cycle with Lance Armstrong but not meet with Cindy Sheehan. There's nothing perplexing about that, folks. Our President is a boob.

We should all know now where his commitments lie. They're certainly not with Cindy Sheehan and the others who've lost family in the war in Iraq. They may not be on staying in shape, either, though I understand Mr. Bush's resting heart rate is below 50. But I must try to wrap my hands around the fact that, at this point in a lame duck presidency, our President cares more about cycling and his own fitness than the health and welfare of the United States of America. Where's the weakness, I ask?

Tuesday, August 23, 2005

Row Row Row Your Boat

Well, since last I blogged the progress of the 1 million meter row, as of today I'm over the 750,000 meter barrier, 762,356 as a matter of fact. It was a big week of rowing with only Sunday off.

Thanks to those of you who've emailed and wished me luck. I'm feeling quite positive as I race to the million meter goal.

Thursday, August 18, 2005

The NCAA Gets My Vote

Political correctness has finally met its match.

The NCAA has banned the use of 18 "offensive" mascots from post-season play this coming year. It's about time.

It's about time that some officious set of white guys finally put the nail into political correctness in this country. These guys have finally got my vote, as I knew someone would, to make sure that the farce we call PC goes into the round file of American culture.

I'm no fan of racially insensitive slurs. Don't get me wrong, I'm not. But I'm also an American who does not understand how it's okay for comedians "of race" to make fun of their own race with slurs or categorize each other by words that I'd be put in PC prison for.

But now we've gone over the line.

If you're thinking I'm a racially insensitive white guy with no experience or knowledge of what being a minority is like, you may be right, as Billy Joel (a well-known cracker) has said via Top 40 music. Then again, I may be crazy, as said Mr. Joel has opined.

I spent two years in New Orleans on the West Bank attending junior high school. Our school was in a relatively okay area. We lived on the base just six blocks from one of the city's largest projects. When we came home from football games on the East Bank (in or around the city on the other side of the river), we'd have to exit into the projects to get back to school. The whiteys took off our uniform jerseys and pads and had to lie in the aisle of the bus so we would not get shot at. This was a real moment that included fear. Real fear. No matter if we won or lost, we were returning to a war zone.

In school we'd play football during gym class. Usually it was the whites versus the blacks. When the whites scored a touchdown, we'd kick off. When the blacks scored, the whites would kick off. At times, during gym class, if you heard, "Get 'em!" that meant some poor kid was being chased down by a group of kids to be beaten up. Needless to say this was not a group of white toughs picking on the lone black kid.

What does this have to do with the NCAA ban on mascots? Well, simply put, I've been on the other side of the racial insensitivity side of the fence. Ask the kid who threatened to stab me at school in New Orleans who referred to me as "the little honky shit" for accidentally moving into his field of vision during a baseball practice.

As a country, we've been moving into a mode of political correctness for years, really starting in the late 70s when the first "sensitivity training" started in the workplace. Things have gone steadily downhill since. Can you imagine movies like "Blazing Saddles" being made today? Some of Eddie Murphy's funniest standup being put on the big screen? Characters like Andrew "Dice" Clay making any money? I can't. And yet, I remember these and others as some of the funniest people because they were unafraid to call things as they saw them. Can you imagine a movie that refers to "Kansas City faggots" being produced today?

What's done this to us? Why are we afraid to face our biggest fears or issues by surfacing them? Does a mascot really harbor some ingrained offense to those it characterizes? Yes and no. Yes in that the caricatures that are ridiculous exaggerations can or could be deemed offensive. I mean, do we need Chief Wahoo dancing around like a moron? Other characters and mascots, such as the Florida St. Seminole, who is required before donning the character's outfit to learn about the heritage of the Seminole Indians and whose costume was designed by the Seminoles, are not. Yet the NCAA's suits have stepped in on behalf of the aggrieved and want us to know that they're looking out for all of us.

How about those Fighting Illini? They're on the list. Have you looked at their logo? Does it seem that, no matter who you are, you would feel disrespected by it? Are you kidding? If so, when are we going to get rid of the Fighting Irish of Notre Dame? I'm offended by the little leprechaun standing with balled fists ready to fight. I've got three real big problems with that: 1) It makes the Irish look like dwarves, little people, runts, whatever. That's wrong. Not all Irish are short. 2) The leprechaun is a fantasy character with Satanic overtones because it has "magical" power. How can Catholics allow this? 3) The guy is a bully. Do we really want our children to push around other kids and solve their problems by fighting? Oh my, no. I certainly do not.

See? Isn't this getting out of control? Do you not see how ridiculous we're getting?

What happens when we start to eliminate the names of fictitious mascots? Jayhawk? Isn't that some cross-bred type of evil bird that represents the worst of society?

Look, we're still a great country. We have our problems. But we continue to pose a threat to ourselves by overcompensating for each other's sensitivity issues. If you're over the age of 35, can you honestly say things are better in this country with political correctness? Or, would you be afraid to say so? Isn't that sad?

Tuesday, August 16, 2005

Questing Still Update

One week ago I posted the whole blog about my quest for 1 million meters on the rowing machine in 1 year. (See that entry below so I don't rehash the entire thing about goals, fried food, and sweetened iced tea. Okay, so nothing about fried food and sweetened iced tea, but I just can't stand iced tea with sweetener. Yuck.)

In my update, I must admit that I had a nice three day rest as the whole family went to The Lake of the Ozarks. That repose has done nothing for my desire to reach the goal, though, and since I've been back, I've hit the machine again. So, today, I report that I have passed the 700,000 meter barrier.

As of today, I am at 707,174, which is up about 36,000 meters during the week, or about 9,000 meters a day since I did not row three days. I must still row about 6,500 meters a day each day to reach the million by September 30. I will be in Canada 8/29 through 8/31, so I have to account for those three days, as well. I have no issue with factoring these three days in, though, and don't see that I will have any problem reaching the million.

Again, if you row for exercise and want someone to talk with, drop me a line. If you don't or want to know more about it, let me know. I'd enjoy trying to persuade you to plunk down the best-spent $850 + tax you'll ever spend on a piece of equipment. Hell, if you just want to try the rower and live in the KC area, let me know. You can always drop by and give it a shot, too.

Wednesday, August 10, 2005

Outsourcing is Good!

Provocative title aside, let me explain.

Before anyone gets too far into this, the usual up front: This might be really long, and poorly reasoned. But isn't that what blogs are for?

Okay, here goes.

Outsourcing is still a major topic of ire for Americans. We complain about it all the time. I rarely go to a function without someone mentioning that they've lost their job to outsourcing or that it's W's fault or that labor unions have made it so attractive for our companies to push so many jobs overseas to cheaper labor. Topic #1: Why aren't we doing anything about it? And if there's something to do, what is it?

The numbers are beginning to have an impact on American life. In the July 25, 2005 Fortune mag article "America Isn't Ready", the statistics (as much as you can believe them) are staggering: McKinsey Global Institute predicts that 49% of packaged software jobs could be outsourced to low-wage countries; some 25% of worldwide banking jobs, 19% of insurance jobs, and 52% of engineering jobs. Yikes. If these totals were to come to fruition, the US unemployment rate would jump from 5 to 11.4%. That's mind boggling.

We're hearing all the time now that our American kids are becoming "Dumb and Dumber". We're steadily falling down the ladder in academic achievement. In that same Fortune article, US 15 year olds now rank 28th in mathematical achievement. Who's the top 5? Finland, South Korea, Canada, Hong Kong, and Netherlands. Now for some ranting: In some of these countries there's nothing to do other than study and in others the government's threatening to imprison your family for failing the tests. Topic #2: Do we want our children to become education automatons?

Along with the Fortune article are some sidebar topics, such as how confident the Indian and Asian teens are to succeed. "We have the best brains, and we beat anyone -- no one is ahead of us," opines one Saksham Karwal. The sidebar includes the word "want" another 8 times. The kids want to do this, want to go to school there, or want to dominate the overnight package delivery industry (just kidding). But there's a heck of a lot of want in there. Topic #3: With this much want, is there the intestinal fortitude to "do" when the breaks are beating the boys (no sexism intended)?

Why aren't we doing anything about all of this change? Because right now we don't feel like it's really something that affects us, that's why. We're complaining on the surface while things are eaten away slowly. There's a number of arguments here: We do nothing about it because we don't see a threat, and that's the wrong thing to do because this is how insidious diseases eventually choke the life from our bodies. They start small and undetectable and then, one day, they've invaded our lungs and brains and it's over. Another argument is that we've become a more well-rounded nation. We're a nation of liberal arts majors. We don't need to only have the manufacturing jobs anymore. We're adaptable. We're moving ahead. Let the 3rd world have the manufacturing jobs, make cheap stuff for us. Why not? They work cheap, right? We'll re-train Americans for more complex, yet less physically demanding, work. As I've argued before, did the steam engine put all of our horses and farmers out of work? No, we adapted and found new ways to work. The bigger threat, though, is in the more purely thinking jobs such as engineering. The more the separated jobs between the physical and virtual are outsourced, the more we are at risk for losing our standard and way of life.

Again, what do we do?

This will be unpopular with lots of folks, but it leads to issue #2. We need to incent our kids to care more about education and testing and learning. I don't think our kids are dumb. They've become fat (literally) and lazy. Why should they show up for some international test that has no bearing on where they go to college or get their next minimum wage job? There is no incentive for our high-school kids to do well anymore on these standardized tests. Just telling them that they can outscore the Canadians and high-five each other ain't enough. The kids who do show up for these things are leaving answers blank, too, because they just can't be bothered to write an essay they don't care about.

We need an educational Olympics that actually rewards our winners. Create a competition that rewards educational success with scholarships and things that kids want, like iPods. Do it every four years. And during the intervening years, the US would hold elimination tourneys to get our best and brightest onto the team, just like our Olympic athletes. But do not, and I firmly reiterate, do not segregate them from society like the North Koreans or old Soviet Union to become educational freaks the way the Olympic athletes were taken from their families and sequestered for years with the threat of gulags if they didn't bring home the gold.

Finally, how will these developing countries react when things don't go their way? Or if, possibly, the bravado, entrepreneurialism, and confidence is suddenly eroded by failure? Or competition? Doesn't anyone else find it ironic that for all the confidence we hear about these folks they've yet to consider the effects of saturation? If everyone's so driven, so smart, so entrepreneurial, aren't they bound to run across someone more of the same? And fail? Not everyone can win right? This isn't bumper bowling, folks. This is business. And business, especially of the free market economy type, isn't exactly a kid glove experience. It's dog eat dog. Did the Japanese not have a similar experience in the '80s when they were dominating industry and buying up Pebble Beach? Their own markets and society didn't adjust well and look where they are now. Most of them aren't exactly teeing it up on #1 with Kevin Costner anymore.

Maybe the Indians and Chinese will be different. Maybe they've learned from other experiences. But then again, maybe they haven't. Maybe they're all flush with confidence and high-paying jobs flowing in from American companies pleased to be cutting costs and getting solid work. And maybe we're making the world a more global experience for everyone. Maybe we're the ones who're giving in a way we never expected. And maybe we're doing this for the love of our money, too, in a completely selfish style. Who knows? Finally, and think hard about this, how long will those low-paying wages satisfy these folks who until now have had nothing? How long will it be before they start demanding raises? They're going to sit there in a factory with no representation and minimal wages forever? Where's the first union representative going to come from? When's the first battle between workers and managers going to come? And when it does, when will it get violent?

But I'll say this: No matter how many wars they've won or lost on the battlefield, the Chinese and Indians and even South Americans (the next "near-sourcing" opportunity) have never, ever battled the way Americans have in business. Our war of independence makes us uniquely qualified to fight to the last person to maintain our way of life. Americans are like Microsoft when they realized the Internet was the next big thing: "Quick, build a browser and give it away!" And they did. And, until recently, that was it for everybody else.

Next time you're whining or hear someone else whine about outsourcing, think about what it means for you, your family, and Americans. We're making the world stronger, making products cheaper for all of us, and losing jobs. We're also creating opportunity for ourselves and the world. And when you fear that our kids are getting dumberer and dumberer, don't fret. They're simply not motivated to win. Find a way to do this, and we will. Finally, when you can't bring yourself any closer to the brink of saying outsourcing is positive, maybe after you've lost your job to someone who'll do it for 1/5th of what you're paid, think to yourself, "Can it stay this way forever?" Nope.

The world is one big place that seems to be closing in on itself. We're globally becoming one industrialized region. But in these newly found hotspots I argue that they haven't seen the effects of free market economy yet. And when they do, they'll be chewing off each others' legs as quickly as Paris Hilton can get her Sidekick hacked. Success carries as much pressure as failure. And the countries we're currently so concerned with have yet to see the pressures of success truly change them. When they do we might all just sit back and have the last laugh while they're outsourcing things back to us.

Monday, August 08, 2005

Quest For Fire

Okay, well, not quite a quest for fire. But a quest nonetheless.

Since October 2004 I've been on a fitness kick. In April 2003 I got up to 204.5 pounds. I was miserable and unhappy. I'm sure some of you who might read this can empathize and sympathize. Being fat is not fun. So, I took my fitness life back at the age of 36. The day before the 20th reunion of the Shawnee Mission NW Cougars class of '85 Friday night party, I weighed in at 174. As a tangent, if any of you I had the pleasure of catching up with are visiting, it was truly a pleasure to see so many people again. And that slide show was excellent (as well as embarrassing). So many varied paths, but with one common, comfortable bond. Go Cougars.

I started losing weight in May 2003. Like I said, I started the fitness regimen in October 2004. I started rowing. If you haven't tried rowing, I highly recommend it. If you have a bad back, get on a rowing machine. If you want a superb whole body workout, try rowing. Hmm, again, off topic.

Well, everyone should find a goal for themselves. We often create goals such as personal ("I want to save for that car."), or health-related ("I'm going to work out 30 minutes every day."), or family ("We're saving $x per month for junior's college tuition and retirement."). Goals are good. I found one through rowing.

If you don't know, 1 mile is about 1,609 meters. I am aiming for 1,000,000 meters completed by September 30, 2005, one year after I first set my butt down on that rowing machine in our basement. Where am I on this quest? Well, with 53 days remaining, I just passed the 661,000 meter mark, which leaves about 339,000 meters to go. When I reach a million meters I will have rowed approximately 621 miles over the previous year. If you're Lance Armstrong, you peddle that in about 1/3rd of the Tour de France. If you're me, you reach a milestone that any self-respecting 38 year old would be proud of. And feel all the better because of it.

So, what do I have to do over the next 53 days to reach my goal? I need to row about 6,400 meters a day without a day off, or about 4 miles a day. I've been averaging about 8,000 a day for the last month to get within striking distance. If I can keep up this pace, I'll finish early and take a well-deserved day off. And then start in on my 2nd million the next day. And, to track my improvement, in October 2004 I was averaging about 8 minutes 30 seconds a mile over 5000 meters. Today I am rowing anywhere between 6:50 and 7 minutes a mile. The 7 minute mile was a milestone achievement.

Who cares, you might be saying? Well, besides me, I'm hoping to get your support to continue this quest. If you have a Concept2 model a, b, c, or d, respond to this post. I'm looking for other rowers who would like to share training sessions and talk rowing. If you don't row, post anyway and wish me luck. I will update as time goes by. Whatever happens, I'm proud of what I've done. I'm no motivational speaker, so I'm not telling you what you don't already know.

What's your quest?